As the November elections draw near, a split has emerged within the House GOP on how to address messaging surrounding in vitro fertilization (IVF). Several House Republicans have been working behind the scenes to convince Speaker Mike Johnson to hold a vote on legislation supporting IVF, but their efforts have been met with resistance.
According to sources close to the matter, these Republicans are pressing Johnson to take action and bring the issue to the forefront ahead of the elections. However, Johnson has thus far remained non-committal, leaving many within the party wondering what the future holds for IVF policy.
The push for IVF legislation comes as fertility treatments have become an increasingly contentious issue within conservative circles. While many see IVF as a necessary support for individuals and families struggling with infertility, others have raised concerns about the ethics and morality of the treatments.
With the elections looming, some Republicans are concerned that failing to address IVF messaging could have unintended consequences for the party. By bringing the issue to a vote, these lawmakers hope to showcase the party's commitment to supporting families and provide a sense of momentum ahead of the elections.
Despite the push from some within the party, Johnson's reluctance to bring the issue to a vote has left many frustrated. Sources close to the Speaker indicate that he is wary of taking on the issue, fearing that it could lead to a divisive debate within the party.
The lack of clear messaging on IVF has already led to controversy for the party. In recent months, several high-profile Republicans have made headlines with comments that many saw as out of touch with the reality of infertility. By holding a vote on IVF legislation, these lawmakers hope to demonstrate a more compassionate and forward-thinking approach to the issue.
For now, however, the fate of IVF legislation remains uncertain. As the November elections draw near, many within the party are holding their breath, waiting to see if Johnson will ultimately decide to bring the issue to the forefront.